Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

The Boingy Grail

Okay, this means war. Not content to impinge on our territory by having Jacques Vallee as a guest-blogger, Boing Boing now also has Graham Hancock posting articles about DMT, the afterlife, and ayahuasca tourism. Back off BB, or I’ll have to have a quiet word with the secret masters about the situation (you and me Pescovitz, mano-a-mano)!

After an earlier series of articles about crop circles, yesterday Jacques posted a new entry titled “I, Product” giving a different take on the growing access that companies have to our private data:

You may think of yourself as a user of Google, Facebook or Amazon, but you are actually their product.

Sure, Google will provide you with search results, but they are not in the search business; they are in the advertising business. Their profits come from marketing firms that buy your behavior.

Similarly, Amazon is not in the book business, although they will send you the books you’ve ordered. They are in the personal information business.

The assets of modern web-based companies are the intimate profiles of those who “use” them, like you and me. Time to forget the nice pronouncements like “Do no evil” that accompany the wholesale destruction of privacy now taking place on the web, or rather within the walled gardens that companies like Facebook, Google and Apple are erecting around us on the web. Compared to them, the Chinese censors re-inventing their Great Wall are a bunch of sissies.

Meanwhile, Graham has posted two articles already as an invited Boing Boing guest-blogger. The first, “Death Holds No Sting: New Perspectives on Psychedelics” covers the latest research into the therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs and then goes deep down the rabbit hole discussing contact with DMT entities. Today’s post focuses on ayahuasca as a ‘new sacrament’ to cure the ills of the West:

Fortunately, say the shamans, they are in a position to offer a remedy. They know of certain plants, growing deep in the rainforest, whose leaves contain dimethyltryptamine — DMT, for short — the powerful hallucinogen whose extraordinary effects I described in yesterday’s essay. Mixed with the pulped inner fibers of a sinuous jungle vine, and boiled in water for a day and a night, these leaves contribute their properties to Ayahuasca (meaning the “Vine of Souls” or “Vine of the Dead”) a potent hallucinogenic brew that’s been in continuous use amongst the cultures of the Amazon for at least three thousand years. The shamans I’ve talked to do seriously suggest that adoption of the brew in the West could yet save us, and all humanity, from the spiraling collapse of ecosystems and the growing murmur of insane conflict that our own behavior has unleashed.

The idea is far from as ridiculous as it might at first sound. As I reported yesterday there’s already good scientific evidence that the judicious and responsible use of hallucinogens can be life-enhancing and life-changing, banishing the fear of death amongst terminal cancer patients and giving veterans real relief from the damaging effects of post-traumatic stress disorder. If that can be so — and be good science as well — then the shamans could be right, or at least not completely wrong, to suggest Ayahuasca as a remedy for the wider ills of the West.

All three are thought-provoking pieces, with plenty to debate, and there’s some good content in the comments at BB regarding each. There’s also a bunch of the now ubiquitous “this is woo!” responses…it’s like ‘skeptics’ are making a concerted effort to be more annoyingly preachy than any other religious group out there. Kudos to Randi and co. for creating such a close-minded, semi-Fascist group of followers!

Anyhow check out the guest-blogs it’s all good stuff. Still Pesco, it’s on buddy…

Editor
  1. Boingskeptics
    It’s a strange strategy for sure, this move toward fringier stuff from Boing Boing. A quick review of the comments seems to suggest that most of their members are not willing to touch these subjects with a 10-foot pole —but on the other hand, they <3 to rant about it.

    Methinks Boing Boing is using Forteana as their Tony Clifton.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsT9Mc_eh_o&feature=related

    I don’t know if that’s the honest thing to do; then again, perhaps there is a genuine interest in bringing more attention to the “out of the box” stuff, I don’t know.

    1. Strange Boing
      [quote=red pill junkie]It’s a strange strategy for sure, this move toward fringier stuff from Boing Boing. A quick review of the comments seems to suggest that most of their members are not willing to touch these subjects with a 10-foot pole —but on the other hand, they <3 to rant about it.[/quote]

      Most of the stranger material on Boing Boing is posted by David Pescovitz, who's a fan of Forteana - he knows Loren Coleman and works with Jacques Vallee (which explains Jacques guest-blogging). I think the Graham Hancock guest-blog probably came about through him being published in the States by Disinfo, which has some links to the Boing Boing crew.

      But yes, the BB comments section is rather choc-full of people voicing their righteous indignation at the woo. Poor souls. (Some of Pesco's responses in the comments section are worth the price of admission though).

  2. BoingBoing
    What’s up with BoingBoing anyway? There’s a reason I spend my time on sites like TDG or Disinfo. It’s not like I’m against dissenting opinion, but the commenters are so reflexively negative that it’s more frustrating than offers any kind of intelligent debate.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal