Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

The Mormon Bigfoot

By Gregon

Things have been far too normal around here lately, so today I give you weirdness on a supreme scale: “The Mormon Bigfoot Genesis Theory“. Is the giant Sasquatch monster really Cain, the murderous second son of Adam and Eve?

But if you think I’m just throwing out crackpot stories for the sake of it, check out Loren Coleman’s recent posting on Mormon involvement in Bigfoot research. I quite like the idea of a ‘Bigfoot Mormon Mafia’ Loren…just as long as they don’t come knocking on my door.

Greg
Editor
Greg is the owner-editor of The Daily Grail, as well as the author of a number of books including Stop Worrying, There Probably is an Afterlife.
Related

10 Comments

    1. Metaphor
      Hi Richard,
      You’ve maybe noticed I’ve read the Bible a lot. Have you ever thought of Cain and Abel as a metaphor for the change from hunter/gatherer to agriculturalist?

      …

      Reality, like time, is relative to the observer

      Anthony North

      1. Exactly
        And apparently Jehova preferred shepherds over farmers.

        No veggies for the Lord, oh no! 🙂

        BTW, I remember my relief over that age-old dilemma of where in tarnation the wife of Cain had come from. I finally found out when checking an online review of the Creation Museum’s exhibit: turns out that —obviously— Cain’s wife was also his SISTER… which was perfectly cool way back then, since only after many hundreds of generations did our DNA began to dillute and corrupt, so now it is not such a good idea to marry your sister.

        Too bad, ’cause my 2 sisters are really head-turners; so maybe I’ll settle for a 2nd cousin or something 😉

        —–
        It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
        It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

        Red Pill Junkie

      2. Metaphor
        Hi Anthony.

        I don’t see it that way but have heard this interpretation.

        As I see it, the polarity between Cain and Abel is the polarity between spirituality and materialism.

        Cain refuses the orders of the hierarchies and develops egocentricity. He then goes on to mate with a non-Adamic female, showing that on Earth, there were the Adamics and the rest of humaniy.

        Abel remains subjected the hierarchies and does not question its orders.

        They then for me represent the severing caused by the knowledge of good and evil.

        I personally don’t look at it in an anthropomorphic way, as I do not believe that the spirit of man comes from his animality and that his evolution on Earth followed the path proposed by scholars, although the other humanity, the one that was there when the Adamic spirit invested matter, may have followed that path and profited from Adamic influences and that of those hierarchies that were very present by their direct communication with the Adamic mind.

        1. Metaphor
          Hi Richard,
          The basic fact is, it is all interpretation – both yours and mine. The success of an interpretation lies not in the interpretation itself, but how many people you can convince.
          ‘Tis always the way with knowledge.

          …

          Reality, like time, is relative to the observer

          Anthony North

          1. Convincing
            I know.

            Although, what is the point in convincing someone of something we are convinced of?

            Generally it simply perpetuates errors as truths.

            It is there, fundamentally, where two point of views will be confronted as each side considers that the other is also interpreting.

            Sometimes, both views can also coincide with a single reality as well but the two point of views simply shed light on two different aspects of the same thing, casting different contours. And it is, if it is the case, a question of making the synthesis of those contours and continuing to shed more light until there is no shadow left.

      3. My opinion –
        I think you’re on the right track here with the Cain and Abel thing, Anthony. Hunting, or breeding animals, was man’s work, whereas growing the crops was considered women’s work. Evidently “the Lord” didn’t think too much about Cain wasting his time on a female occupation and refused his offerings. Understandably, Cain got somewhat mad at this as agriculture is much harder work than swanning out with the bow and arrows and shooting the occasional buffalo or sitting around waiting for animals to produce young without assistance. That’s why he took revenge. I’d have felt the same way!

        Regards. Kathrinn

        1. Opinions
          Absolutely, Richard. That’s why moderation is so important.
          This is the thing with the Bible, I’m sure, Kathrinn. It all makes sense if we look at it in terms of the knowledge we know.
          They were bright writers. It’s just that I think another ‘truth’ appeared somewhere in translation.

          …

          I’m fanatical about moderation

          Anthony North

          1. The Bible
            Is a very interesting book when you read it with a particular mind set.

            Everything has double sense, especially in Genesis.

            Technically speaking, the book of Genesis should speak of Atlantis. The infusion of a new man concept on the planet.

            It hints at numerous things that somehow seems to have escaped the main religious branches that are seated on those writings. But it must not have escaped the more esoteric establishements of those religions.

            Still, some points brought by the early book obviously show major differences in the psychic states of the early epoch.

            For instance, a direct telepathic line with a universal source. I say a universal source, because it is nowhere explained if that source is the same for all persons or if it is differentiated. That is of course the voice with which Adam and his kins speak with.

            The book speaks of a race newly infused in matter. Yet it clearly states that there were already some humanoids present on the planet at the time. So, what it says is that there are those infused Adamic entities and those other humans; us and them. This has obviously not escaped the Jewish scholars.

            I regard this book more in relation with the early stages of an important event that was not perfectly understood by the writers but that was obviously experienced very differently than what we are accustomed today in our day to day lives.

            This does not dismiss interpretations, such as yours, that take into account what modern research has brought us in terms of the material life of the people of the time. But we obviously will look at it from the direction we want to look at, which is quite ok, since all directions are valid. And, you must have guessed by now, I have more interest in consciousness than I do in the origin of maize, hence the direction of my outlook.

            But one outlook can be added to another outlook to create a greater and more complete fresco, because things are rarely one or the other.

            If we go back to Cain, we could envision that the disconnection with the universal circuits, that which allowed to communicate with this universal source naturally, happened because man chose the company of men and chose to refuse to be dominated by the voice. They wanted to be the boss within their experience. But they got caught with the nature of their new instincts and sought to dominate themselves. It shows the objective nature of the internal communication system that today has been highjacked by forces working in anonymity to create the illusion of subjective thinking.

            So, I find this book to be a mine of information for the prospective mind. It all depends what one is looking for.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal