Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon
Melvin Morse Sentenced to Three Years Prison

Near-Death Experience Researcher Melvin Morse Given Three Years Prison for Abusing Child

Well-known near-death experience researcher Melvin Morse, convicted two months ago of ‘waterboarding’ his step-daughter by holding her head under a faucet, has been sentenced to three years prison by the judge presiding over the case. Shockingly, given the details of the case, Morse was a former pediatrician (his licence was revoked) who had become famous for his research into the near-death experiences of children. This had led some to speculate that the abuse of the child was an attempt at inducing an NDE, though ultimately the judge disagreed on that count:

The judge ordered Melvin Morse, 60, to serve two years on probation after completing the prison term. Morse also received concurrent sentences of probation for other charges of endangering and assault.

…Morse, whose medical license was suspended after his arrest and has since expired, wrote several books and articles on paranormal science and near-death experiences involving children. He has appeared on shows such as “Larry King Live” and the “The Oprah Winfrey Show” to discuss his research, which also has been featured on an episode of “Unsolved Mysteries” and in an article in “Rolling Stone” magazine. Morse denied police claims he may have been experimenting on the girl.

“The idea that the defendant was experimenting on (the girl) is speculative, and I see his actions differently,” said the judge, who described Morse as controlling and manipulative in his abuse of a vulnerable child.

Beyond the sad tale of abuse in this case, where does this leave Morse’s body of research on the NDE? Should it be disregarded on moral grounds simply because it is the work of a convicted child abuser, or perhaps more cogently because – in a field that leans heavily on personal testimony – this throws doubt on his honesty and integrity? I for one would find it difficult to cite any of his research in future, for the latter reasoning, unless the details could be corroborated via another source.

Editor
  1. The moral nihilism of science
    The moral nihilism of science as practiced has never really been taken into account in the acceptance or rejection of research results. If researchers’ results were rejected because they were guilty of moral outrages enormous areas of science would disappear. When Fritz Haber should have been being put on trial as a war criminal for his participation in gas warfare, he was being given the Nobel prize. Considering how much science is done around armaments that are responsible for the deaths of millions of people, this outrageous and misguided atrocity is a drop in the ocean.

    If you consider cruelty and neglect of animals – much of it needless and useless – vast ranges of psychology and biology would have to go. And now it would seem that science is beginning to ask itself the question that was never answered before they made that an intrinsic part of science, are animals really enough like people to make that research relevant to human biology. From what I’ve read in the past year, the answer is, unshockingly, no.

    1. A drop in the water
      Ethical scientists who have been guilty of immoral or unethical behavior, in personal activities outside their professional career, is one thing; we wouldn’t & shouldn’t expect scientists to have an impeccable moral behavior –they’re scientists, not saints.

      But I think this case is different, since the immoral behavior –child abuse– seems to have been related to Morse’s NDE research in some capacity.

      NDE is mainly perceived as without scientific merits by the majority of the academic community. As such, it heavily relies on the credentials of the few scientists risking their career to support it; whether we like it or not, for the time being the credentials of these few mavericks must be as irreproachable as humanly possible.

      Yes, the playing field is uneven; yes, it is unfair, but that’s just life.

  2. WTF?
    Our societies seem to be getting increasingly stupid and PC-wussy. So he held her head under a faucet . .big deal! When I was in junior high there were many times kids did that to other kids. Use a shower without an aerator and it’s the same thing.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal