Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

Sean Carroll: The Arrow of Time

If there is one thing that is nearly always on my mind, it is time. Trying to cram 30 hours into 24 hours each day tends to do that. But beyond constantly thinking of our own personal time issues, the actual subject of ‘time’ is one of the deepest and most difficult concepts to define and understand. One person trying to do that right now is physicist Sean Carroll.

A gifted communicator of difficult cosmological concepts, Carroll summarised where he’s coming from in a recent article in Wired:

I’m trying to understand how time works. And that’s a huge question that has lots of different aspects to it. A lot of them go back to Einstein and spacetime and how we measure time using clocks. But the particular aspect of time that I’m interested in is the arrow of time: the fact that the past is different from the future. We remember the past but we don’t remember the future. There are irreversible processes. There are things that happen, like you turn an egg into an omelet, but you can’t turn an omelet into an egg.

And we sort of understand that halfway. The arrow of time is based on ideas that go back to Ludwig Boltzmann, an Austrian physicist in the 1870s. He figured out this thing called entropy. Entropy is just a measure of how disorderly things are. And it tends to grow. That’s the second law of thermodynamics: Entropy goes up with time, things become more disorderly.

But there’s a missing piece…which is, why was the entropy ever low to begin with? Why were the papers neatly stacked in the universe? Basically, our observable universe begins around 13.7 billion years ago in a state of exquisite order, exquisitely low entropy. It’s like the universe is a wind-up toy that has been sort of puttering along for the last 13.7 billion years and will eventually wind down to nothing. But why was it ever wound up in the first place? Why was it in such a weird low-entropy unusual state? That is what I’m trying to tackle.

Carroll goes into much more depth on the topic in his recently released book, From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time (Amazon US and UK). You’ll also have your mind hurt nicely by these TED videos of Carroll discussing the arrow of time at the University of Sydney in December 2009: Part 1, and Part 2 (I originally embedded them here, but it seems they autoplay so I removed them). Not exactly light viewing, but fascinating stuff.

Editor
  1. The Universe is a Wind-Up Toy
    The way Carroll’s article reads that, “It’s like the universe is a wind-up toy that has been sort of puttering along for the last 13.7 billion years and will eventually wind down to nothing” – it makes one think we are merely somebody’s sea monkey experiment in a virtual cosmic program on their computer. Are we really trapped in The Matrix or on The Thirteenth Floor? Entropy is a difficult obstacle to overcome when contemplating time and creation unless there was some super creator of some kind – hopefully a sympathetic God that endowed us with eternal souls, but how depressing if we are just some well written software program existing solely on someone’s mohterboard – not that that is what Carroll is saying – I have not read his book, just reacting to his short article. Book is probably a good read.

    1. To my mind the only way we
      To my mind the only way we are not in some type of metaphorical matrix is if this reality is real and is as important as any other. Otherwise someone/something is playing games with us that we are not aware of, or at best are guessing at. Surely behind all the computer and robot enslavement storylines that is what is at the heart of the Matrix story.

      I’ve been fascinated with time since i was a kid. This thermodynamic approach to understanding time is fascinating. One of those things that once you understand is like lifting the hood/bonnet of a car and seeing the engine for the first time.

      Best example i have seen is this. Imagine taking photos of the atoms in a uniform gas of even temperature. Then jumble the pictures up. There is no way to put them back together. There is no apparent flow of time. Only when there is a difference in order/disorder do you see the flow of time. Such as if you had a box split in two, one side full, the other empty – then removed the divider and photographed the atoms.

      So the thought emerges that time itself is not fundamental, but is instead emerging from the laws of entropy. It is an illusion occurring because of the flow of heat. For us this illusion is utterly encompassing, orbiting a burning hot star in cold empty space. The same is true for the universe as a whole, filled with energy left over from the big bang, pulled into patterns by the laws of nature. Ultimately though, because the universe is expanding, the finite energy will come to fill larger and larger volumes until eventually the universe reaches thermodynamic equilibrium at which point nothing much will be happening.

      From what i gather at the moment the space outside this universe is perceived to be more like that – generally in thermodynamic equilibrium, where the macroscopic arrow of time collapses and the quantum arrow (the non existent arrow) dominates. The laws dominating in the multiversal space dictate that quantum fluctuations of low entropy are special and undergo sudden massive expansion, feeding off the energy of gravity within the growing bubble and converting gravitational energy into matter. Another universe is born.

      [Edit:] Just one addition. This notion doesn’t destroy time as something that applies to us. It does and is as relevant as ever. It gets rid of it as a fundamental of quantum mechanics in all circumstances in the way we might imagine time to be before we think about it in this manner. This is still a big change as we now have a way to avoid the infinite regression that has so bothered philosophers, theologians and scientists for, well, ever. We do not get to ignore time, or the flow of atoms, as a central part of our lives through this type of physics though. We would still need others to accomplish that.

      1. Thank you
        I have never had ‘time’ explained so well. Time is a is just a medium of measurement, just as is a ruler or a measuring cup. An inch, a minute or a liter is just a way in which we can quantify that which is happening around us.

        Without our memories to know what was, there would be no past. Without our imagination we would never have a future.

        1. plus
          Plus, memory and imagination are probably the same mechanism in the brain – imagination is just a memory of things that have not happened, and typically won’t.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal