Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

The (Next) Day the Earth Stood Still

This weekend sees the release of the ‘remake’ of the classic 1951 alien contact film, The Day the Earth Stood Still (we noted its pervasive influence in Monday’s News Briefs). With Keanu Reeves, Jennifer Connelly and John Cleese playing the leading characters, the updated storyline shifts the focus from the perils of nuclear weaponry (a major concern in 1951) to the dangers of human degradation of the environment, and updates the sci-fi technology aspect to a more ‘modern’ view (e.g. the flying saucer becomes a ‘temporal space translator’). Here’s the trailer:

Interesting to note that SETI’s Seth Shostak was consultant on the film, and he’s written a piece for Space.com about the experience. Shostak corrected technical details, and also nit-picked the scientific dialogue – to the point where it seems that director Scott Derrickson got a little peeved:

Derrickson joked that initially he was chagrined to get the first draft of the script back from Shostak with huge sections crossed out as being wrong-wrongedy-wrong. Derrickson needed more than that, and wasn’t afraid to say so: “I said, ‘Okay, I get it, the draft was wrong, now stop being so condescending and help me figure out what the lines should be.'”

Given his recent CSICOPian tendencies, I wonder if Shostak put a big red line through the complete aliens-visiting-Earth concept with a note saying “well this is obviously impossible and there’s no evidence to suggest it!”…

Actually, when I saw that Shostak was a consultant on the film, I pondered on the possible discussions between he and John Cleese, given the Monty Python star’s interest in ‘fringe’ ideas. Sure enough, Seth Shostak mentions it in his article:

Between takes, both Reeves and Cleese solicited my opinion on subjects that had nothing to do with the film. In particular, they wanted to know why we’re here. What’s the grander meaning of our existence? Apparently a lot of people assume that astronomers, who deal with big things and long timescales, have some insight into what life is all about. More than, say, tax accountants.

“Surely,” Cleese ventured, “we’re here for a purpose.” I figured that a lifetime of standing around movie and television sets, not to mention the front desk at Fawlty Towers, had prompted this question.

“Well, John,” I responded, “maybe that’s true. Maybe there is some grand plan. But then again, you might have asked that question 100 million years ago, hanging out with a bunch of your dinosaur pals. The answer then was ‘you’re just a dinosaur.’ The answer today might be no more profound.”

I’m not sure Cleese was fully gratified by my response.

Trailers, images and additional content related to the new film can be found at the official movie site.

Editor
  1. Hmm
    [quote]”Well, John,” I responded, “maybe that’s true. Maybe there is some grand plan. But then again, you might have asked that question 100 million years ago, hanging out with a bunch of your dinosaur pals. The answer then was ‘you’re just a dinosaur.’ The answer today might be no more profound.”[/quote]

    …But then again, dinosaurs weren’t able to make that question. Maybe our ability to do so gives US purpose.

    Or maybe we’re all just tiger food 😉

    —–
    It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
    It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

    Red Pill Junkie

  2. Not sure
    about my verdict. Was left disappointed of the content. It could have used an extra half an hour to 45 minutes of it. Hopefully Watchmen will do better to live up to expectations

  3. I liked it
    Handled the ‘human similarity’ problem quite elegantly. The plan to destroy mankind was very scary and interesting—Gort was awesome!— Maybe the only thing that I regret was the too-small appearance of Cleese, and the lack of depth in the relationship between Klaatu and the little boy.

    [[[Spoiler alert: If you haven’t seen the movie, skip the rest of my comment]]]

    The most interesting thing for me was the assertion by Klaatu that in the Universe there are only a handful of worlds capable of sustaining complex life forms. Something alleged abductee/contactee Whitely Strieber has mentioned a few times on his blog at unknowncountry.com. That would mean that the result of Drake’s equation is disappointingly low.

    —–
    It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
    It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

    Red Pill Junkie

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal