80's Sitcom Predicted Gaddafi's Death?
Posted by red pill junkie at 18:08, 22 Oct 2011In the opening scene for the pilot of the 1987's TV sitcom Second Chance, we see St Peter casting judgement on Colonel Gaddafi, after he dies in the faraway year of 2011.
Mere coincidence, or further confirmation that we live in a hyper-reality where Fact & Fantasy are inter-twined via pop culture? I'll let you --and not St Peter-- be the judge.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Comments
2 May 2004
1 hour 44 min
I'm now watching all episodes of Mork & Mindy for references to ET disclosure.
~ * ~
@levitatingcat
12 April 2007
52 min 15 sec
Don't forget Alf, and check out Taxi for possible references to 9/11 :P
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie
2 May 2004
1 hour 44 min
When I was a kid, everyone called me Ricky Ricardo (still do). So whenever I saw I Love Lucy, I always thought I'd marry a woman named Lucy one day.
I'm a bachelor with a one-eyed cat. 'Nuff said.
~ * ~
@levitatingcat
25 October 2011
1 year 30 weeks
lol,very funny,Ricky Ricardo you are very good,nice post.
6 April 2010
13 hours 30 min
yeah but it's off by about 4 months, July versus October.
...I forgot how I got here but everyone seems to be heading off in that direction. I hope someone brought food. I have a feeling this is going to be a long journey................
12 April 2007
52 min 15 sec
Well, to be fair, the man should have gotten the Hell out Libya by July ;)
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
Just another bit of evidence that these things are planned many years in advance by people who take delight in the power to do whatever the hell they want to do whenever they want to do it.
12 April 2007
52 min 15 sec
Maybe... although why would 'they' have chosen such a lame & short-lived sitcom to reveal their method I guess we're not 'in the know' to know ;)
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie
6 April 2010
13 hours 30 min
maybe they didn't, maybe the writers knew something they shouldn't have spoken of ;)
...I forgot how I got here but everyone seems to be heading off in that direction. I hope someone brought food. I have a feeling this is going to be a long journey................
12 April 2007
52 min 15 sec
And so the show was terminated. Gotcha ;)
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie
14 April 2009
3 weeks 6 days
Such service. What a TV program!
I wonder if they have one where they put the Powerball winning #'s in some episode of Law & Order?
---------
All that lives is holy, life delights in life.
--William Blake
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
http://www.uaff.us/simpsons_xfiles_911.htm
C'mon guys. These jerks take great delight in rubbing it in our faces, and the subtext of that is that we get the message loud and clear that they can do whatever the hell they want whenever they want to do it. It is intended to be demoralizing
14 April 2009
3 weeks 6 days
"Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when someone laughs."
-GB Shaw
Why are you attached to them being jerks, in them taking great delight and being demoralized?
Where do your thoughts & feelings come from?
(nice link btw)
---------
All that lives is holy, life delights in life.
--William Blake
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
My thoughts and feelings come from the millions of people murdered senselessly by the war machine which is the one of the chief playthings of the power people whoever they may be at the moment. There certainly is a "they." "They" act in concert and are immensely destructive. "They" may be a shifting group of people - at times organized - at times not. "They" is a human tendency to concentrate and sequester power and be reckless and brutal with that power.
14 April 2009
3 weeks 6 days
I was writing specifically aboot your writing "It is intended to be demoralizing"
Do your thoughts and feelings of this demoralizing come from outside yourself? Is there some kind of 'emanator of demoralization', say like the sun, that you are but a passive receiver of? An empty vessel waiting to be filled?
---------
All that lives is holy, life delights in life.
--William Blake
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
It doesn't demoralize me personally because I am aware of the game being played in several layers, but I have seen it demoralize friends who wilt in the face of so much subtle taunting. It works on some people.
Most people here are familiar with the book below which does a nice job of explaining "revelation of method" and "ritual taunting."
http://www.amazon.com/Societies-Psycholo...
Here is a nice little synopsis of Hoffman's ideas froma fellow orgoniteer:
http://www.whale.to/b/revelation_method_...
Hoffman is also careful to point out that though these psychopathic cults might love to indulge in occult play they do not necessarily actually have any occult power, so there isn't any need necessarily to get worked up on that account. Money and power can accomplish all sorts of dastardly deeds, and it is easy for the perps to lay a veneer of occult power over their actions when in fact it was just the money and connections at work. The veneer of the occult just makes them appear to be possessed of "fated" powers which then can give some onlookers the impression that to "resist is futile." That is the real message of these corrupted groups.
14 April 2009
3 weeks 6 days
Right :3
(and just to let you know that nowhere do I think that you are crazy or unhinged or that your experiences and feelings and thoughts aren't invalid)
So when you write "C'mon guys. These jerks take great delight in rubbing it in our faces, and the subtext of that is that we get the message loud and clear that they can do whatever the hell they want whenever they want to do it. It is intended to be demoralizing"
What that says to me is that you see some of us not reacting properly, in that to you we don't treat these certain people as jerks and react to them as jerks, that we aren't properly demoralized by it and so forth.
And I say and am trying to show you the role you play in your thoughts & your feelings. That outside of you you can't expect anyone else to think and feel and even act as you do (to do so is to be attached, to base your feeling on how you see others reacting in a way that you see as proper). That even if you perceive someone as laughing, that doesn't mean that they aren't also being 'serious'.
All you can hope for, I think, is to share in the common human experience here. Laugh, cry, rage, bethune (see, I made up an emotion).
And I'm glad that the internet is around so that I can share in such differing povs.
ps a bonus to all of our communications here is that maybe some of them might help someone become a bit more alive, a bit less reliant on the various worlds that have been created for them and that they live in, that they have a choice if they want to in which world they want to live in and start intentionally creating it :3
---------
All that lives is holy, life delights in life.
--William Blake
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
I can expect people "outside of me" to act. We often act or rather react to the same things in the same manner especially when crimes have been committed and a rationale response is required. Whatever else you are saying it is not being said well enough to make much sense to me. Try again.
17 September 2010
29 weeks 1 day
We can't beat them at their own game. The only way to "win" is to refuse to play. Refusing to play involves not investing emotional energy in their actions. Refusing to play also involves letting go of the belief that we can use our existing institutions to catch and punish them. War breeds more war.
Some people make a conscious choice not to react. Instead, they invest their emotional energy into creating a reality that inspires them. This approach falls along the lines of Einstein's quote, "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." It's easier to get to this place of non-reaction if one comes to the conclusion that we've all chosen the roles we are here on earth to play. There are heros and villains, to be sure, but at the end of the experience - we're all equal, connected, and one.
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
Educating our fellow man as to the nature of their dupe is worthy and fun. The reality that inspires me happens to include stopping psychopaths from throwing any more of our children into the cauldron of war, and I really don't care what the odds are of my achieving that goal. When I see a murder in progress on the sidewalk I intervene.
17 September 2010
29 weeks 1 day
"The reality that inspires me happens to include stopping psychopaths from throwing any more of our children into the cauldron of war, and I really don't care what the odds are of my achieving that goal."
Given this, your reality appears to be premised on the archetype of hero, villain, and innocent victim. Nothing wrong with this, IMHO. Just suggesting that fundamental shifts away from these age-old archetypes could render the current control systems obsolete.
An alternative view is that we are all perfect spiritual beings here having a human experience. And that the psychopaths "out there" in our experience are a reflection of our own collective inner shadow. IMO, the fastest way to remove the unpleasant reflection of our collective shadow is to go inward. A Native American healer I once knew often said, "The healing of one is the healing of all." As we each address our own individual fears, distorted paradigms, emotional imprints, etc., our outer reality shifts. The shadows disappear. The psychopaths lose power. This is an intervention of a wholly different kind.
12 April 2007
52 min 15 sec
Now THAT I can agree with :)
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
_______________
@red_pill_junkie
14 April 2009
3 weeks 6 days
*chuckle* sorry m'dear. I will try to make my meaning more plain:
In this thread post # 12 you wrote: "C'mon guys. These jerks take great delight in rubbing it in our faces, and the subtext of that is that we get the message loud and clear that they can do whatever the hell they want whenever they want to do it. It is intended to be demoralizing"
Can you remember why you wrote that?
---------
All that lives is holy, life delights in life.
--William Blake
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
You are going to have to be less cryptic. Surely whatever you are trying to say can be said more plainly.
If you are trying to imply that by making such a statement I am "investing them with power" then let me remind you of what Hoffman often reiterated - exposing the deed and naming it is not synonymous with falling under its spell or giving it power. It is simply describing the mindset and attributes of the perpetrators and coming to an understanding of what motivates them. That is how police work proceeds. If you thought I was being too reckless by asserting a general "you guys" to include yourself then let me apologize for insulting you. This forum is a ramshackle collection of personages and kind of an anything goes place. We take rhetorical liberties at times, and most everyone here understands that the general "we" may or may not include them. At a bar side discussion there is going to be a bit of reckless fun.
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
"Given this, your reality appears to be premised on the archetype of hero, villain, and innocent victim. Nothing wrong with this, IMHO. Just suggesting that fundamental shifts away from these age-old archetypes could render the current control systems obsolete."
Sorry sir, but sweetness and light just doesn't always cut it. The internet has empowered a national vigilante squad of researchers who have very specific information about a certain large crime - the 911 false flag attack - which has thrust us into absurd wars, helped to bankrupt the US with enormous military budgets, and upended the Constitution. This is not some abstract or vague accusation. I am well aware of the power of ignoring and not giving something energy, but you seem not to understand the clear and present danger of our predicament at the moment. At any time a conflagration in the Middle East could take wing and wreak havoc on the planet. The same cabal that was behind the 911 stage piece is behind the latest insanity with regard to Iran. These are real people with real agendas and real psychopathologies. Ignore them at your peril.
17 September 2010
29 weeks 1 day
"Sorry sir, but sweetness and light just doesn't always cut it."
I'm a woman, actually. And definitely not all sweetness and light! I was actually raised by a sociopath so, unfortunately, I am all too aware of the damage that people with certain psychopathologies can cause. My main point was that I believe information about global conspiracies is best shared in conjunction with information about the bigger spiritual picture. IMHO, without a bigger-picture context, talk of cabals can lean towards fear-mongering. I certainly admire researchers and sharers of this type of information. I'm just not a big fan of vigilantes because I believe they unintentionally contribute to the problem. Much of what the cabal does is intended to keep us in a fear-based paradigm. If, instead of terrorists, we warn others to be afraid of the cabal - how much better off are we really?
Yes, there are real people out there with real agendas. And those who want to know the details about them will seek out this information. But the amazing thing about the way this dimension works is that we each have a higher self, an Essence, an intuitional guidance system - whatever you want to call it - and if we choose to listen to it and follow it, we will be exactly where we need to be when (and if) "peril" arises. IMHO, focusing on connecting to that part of ourselves is more useful than trying to out-guess and out-maneuver those responsible for 911. Because these left-brain chess games are slowly, gradually coming to an end.
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
I used to have a similar argument with my wife who thought my persistence in ferreting out the numerous details of the 911 op to be a sign or paranoia and fearfulness, but the same accusation could then be leveled at any policeman or detective just doing the job. I do not find the endeavor fearful or paranoid, and it does not make me anxious in the slightest. It is just the right thing to do. The advent of the high speed internet alongside the 911 op was to me so fortuitous as to have perhaps been a sort of divine providence. The internet really cut its eye teeth on the 911 op and proved how incredibly fruitful the net could be in bringing people together to cross check their notes and see patterns. I might also mention that most of my time this past decade was spent developing new devices to create ormes and now lately orgonite - two materials that are about as transcendent as matter can be on this plane. Somehow my dogged pursuit of crime families has in no way derailed my ability to also persist in these sciences which are almost purely of the aethers and spirit.
You may have noticed by some of my other postings here that I am also fascinated with some rather morbid paranormal documentary shows on television - shows which by the way my wife cannot watch. They scare her too much, but for some of us, believe it or not, the fear factor is just not there. I am too fascinated by what these documentaries tell us about the so called "other side" and reality in general to be distracted by fear and the promotion of fear. My wife marvels that I am able to watch this stuff with an almost "clinical detachment." By the way, I am not singling out women here. Some of the most ardent 911 conspiracy researchers I know are women, and especially in the field of the paranormal the women are pretty much out in front of the research.
It is funny how far afield we got from the original content of this thread. The most salient thing to me about the thread is that Gaddafi has been a marked man almost ever since he got on the radar screen all those years ago, so a sitcom predicting his death was not very prescient. It was bet most people would have made even back then.
I am more impressed with the more specific mass media enactments that preceded 911, and the obvious use of sacred numbers - especially "11" which is an old favorite of the crowd that pretty much regards most of humanity as its plaything. You may recall that Poppy Bush gave one of his most emphatic speeches about the NWO on 9/11, and also that the war games used to mask the op were normally carried out in November - not September. Then there is of course, the obvious identification with "911" the emergency number that everyone dials when the stuff hits the fan. With Bush Jr. safely kept out the way while reading a story about a "pet goat" (Baphomet) the op then proceeds to unfold. The obviousness of the symbolism employed tells us a lot about the sneering ruthlessness of these people. It doesn't frighten me - it just makes me mad.
Perhaps I can illustrate my own attitude to these sorts of things by linking to the very first episode of the Bio Channel's "My Ghost Story" in which we see two entirely different reactions to what is for most people a "scary" subject. My reaction is more like that of the second engineer. It is fascination - not fear.
17 September 2010
29 weeks 1 day
The anger lessens, at least it did for me, when one recognizes how these people were raised. I don't know if you are familiar with Svali - but I believe her description of the torture and mind control that's used is fairly accurate. These individuals are exposed to horrific things as very young children and taught a very cruel world view from infancy. We can all say that if we were born into one of these families that we would recognize the wrongs and become outspoken defectors. But we can't truly know how we would behave because most of us haven't been exposed to this level of systematic abuse. Compassion isn't an easy task, of course. If it were easy, we'd all be enlightened masters/yogis/saints by now.
Back to the main topic - Gaddafi... I agree he was a marked man and it didn't really require insider knowledge to predict his death. But how did 2011 - of all years - pop into the writer's mind? I think this gets at a question that is not examined often enough: What is imagination?
I happen to think that everything we imagine is a true reality somewhere - whether it's a future occurrence in our timeline, or an alternate timeline, or an alternate dimension, or an interpretation of an alternative dimension, or something we just created in a non-physical/subtle plane. A thought-form of energy. Which may be why Jesus encouraged people to not just behave well, but to think well, too.
18 September 2007
23 hours 2 min
"Revenge is a dish best served cold."
However, I am not really out for revenge or even justice. The cabal behind 911 and even the London subway bombing is still alive and kicking and perfectly capable of pulling another horrendous stunt. I do what little I can to expose them and perhaps head them off at the pass.
14 April 2009
3 weeks 6 days
emlong,
thank you for your answer :3 When I first read your response (your post # 12), it seemed meaningless to me, out of 'left field'. But since I am experienced at rapping, it didn't faze me or insult me. So I decided to use one of my communication tools of holding up a mirror to you and seeing where you went with it.
Then I decided to finally just ask you what you meant. And here we are :3
Very cool.
EDIT: I also realize that we all have different causes that we evangelize in our own particular ways. Look at the lovely communication between you and A.Muse. Like modern psychologists & the ancient alchemists, both can be dealing with the same thing but use different language and 'techniques'. Salve levitas!
---------
All that lives is holy, life delights in life.
--William Blake