Two weeks ago, a man’s life ended in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He was gunned down in the darkened living room of the home he had had recently rented, while his wife of two weeks watched helplessly as the life drained from his body. The perpetrators, (of which there were two), were arrested and confessed shortly thereafter. It turns out that the triggerman had been persuaded to accompany his friend to this home in order to execute the occupant of the property for the unspeakable atrocity of sleeping with the latter’s girlfriend. As already noted, their mission was a complete success; the lone exception being that the intended victim had moved from the property some weeks before. The man who died was, by all accounts, a decent, hard working human being, who had just happened to rent the wrong house.
On the same day, halfway around the world, a different scenario played out; a scenario which has become so commonplace that most of us are now immune to the daily intonations of this occurrence on the nightly news. Someone had been persuaded that the highest and best use of his life involved strapping a mass of explosives to his body and strolling into the midst of a busy market in Baghdad. Over twenty people lost their lives, while scores of others suffered horrible injuries.
The Albuquerque story is just one of thousands that play out daily in the States. Crime, drug abuse, contempt for education and a complete lack of sexual mores has absolutely riddled the underclass both here and in Western Europe. Decadence reigns, and popular culture continues to both drive and reflect the absence of any sense of coherent morality in the West. At the same time, the Baghdad incident demonstrates the continuing horror inflicted upon the world by the most recent incarnation of dogmatic theism.
The issue of deteriorating morality that we are faced with might be among the most tragic consequences of the incredible war of egos that defines global society in today’s world. While it is true that the rise of materialism has led to tremendous technological accomplishments, the associated rise of secular naturalism has had consequences that are far from humane, as outlined above.
Those of a religious persuasion, who long for and advocate a return to the rigid Christian morality of 19th century England, or a Puritan and evangelical America, are deluding themselves. They also apparently don’t understand that by doing so, they are essentially impotent against the rising influence of Islam in Western Europe, and those who envision the eventual perfection of society to be accomplished through widespread adoption of Sharia Law. The Judeo-Christian argument against the Islamic vision boils down to little more than: “My God’s better than yours”.
This all came to mind as a consequence of reading Manly P. Hall’s encyclopedic treatment of the ancient Mystery Schools and eclectic esoteric knowledge, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, in which Hall delivers a lengthy, passionate cry for the rediscovery of the lost wisdom of humanity’s past. Certain observations that he made, while writing in 1928, speak directly to both the loss of morality that infects our world today, and contain a glimmer of hope for our common future.
As an all-too brief introduction to Hall’s premise, The Secret Teachings demonstrates that nearly all of the ancient societies were either heavily influenced by, or developed organically in a very like manner to, the Hermetic philosophy of ancient Egypt, the actual history of which is lost to an unknown age. What remains is but fragments and mythology, but the fundamental understanding of the “Thrice Great Hermes’ remains, dormant and forgotten, at the heart of all of the religions on earth.
The common denominator between all of the ancients was an understanding that can only be described as panentheistic idealism. The ancient societies that Hall exhaustively researched while writing his manifesto clearly had a structure that far surpassed our own in many respects. This was accomplished through the understanding and acceptance of a single worldview, based on One truth, which was distributed throughout the populace in a definite fashion.
Two observations Hall makes are particularly critical to the issue of reinstating an appreciation for morality, as well as many other issues faced by global society today. The first has to do with the relationship between philosophy, science and religion. Hall writes:
“Among the ancients, philosophy, science, and religion were never considered as separate units: each was regarded as an integral part of the whole. Philosophy was scientific and religious; science was philosophic and religious; religion was philosophic and scientific. Perfect wisdom was considered unattainable save as the result of harmonizing all three of these expressions of mental and moral activity.”
It is abundantly clear that our world today is suffering from the failure to grasp the necessity of the reintegration of these three aspects of perfect wisdom. We have not only separated the aspects, but what remains of religion and philosophy has been shattered into countless unintelligible pieces. I would posit that mankind will not find solutions to its ills until it learns to reintegrate these three disciplines.
The second point that Hall makes has to do with how the ancient societies accomplished the integration of their ideals throughout the whole of their social, cultural and intellectual structure. After acknowledging that there are different levels of mental acuity among men, and addressing the issue of creating adherence to a single standard, Hall writes:
“Those of immature mentality, on the other hand, when similarly confronted [by moral choices], are overwhelmed. While the former [the elite] may be qualified to solve the riddle of their own destiny, the latter must be led like a flock of sheep and taught in simple language. They depend almost entirely upon the ministrations of the shepherd. The Apostle Paul said that these little ones must be fed with milk, but that meat is the food of strong men. Thoughtlessness is almost synonymous with childishness, while thoughtfulness is symbolic of maturity.
“There are, however, but few mature minds in the world; and thus it was that the philosophic-religious doctrines of the pagans were divided to meet the needs of these two fundamental groups of human intellect--one philosophic, the other incapable of appreciating the deeper mysteries of life. To the discerning few were revealed the esoteric, or spiritual, teachings, while the unqualified many received only the literal, or exoteric, interpretations.”
He expands on this in is introduction to Kabbalah, the mystical branch of Judaism which grew to become embraced by Jews and Christians alike in the medieval period, and has attracted resurgent interest in recent years:
“Hebrew theology was divided into three distinct parts. The first was the law, the second was the soul of the law, and the third was the soul of the soul of the law. The law was taught to all the children of Israel; the Mishna, or the soul of the law, was revealed to the Rabbins and teachers; but the Qabbalah, the soul of the soul of the law, was cunningly concealed, and only the highest initiates among the Jews were instructed in its secret principles.”
As I see it, the only choice that remains to the world today is to return to an understanding of reality that was known to the ancients, with the ensuing coherent distribution of that understanding to the masses. I actually think this has already begun, and these efforts are underway. Though many may not be cognizant of the ancient roots behind it, people are beginning to wake up.
On the level of the intellectual elite, the scholar Peter Kingsley has written extensively about the loss of the wisdom tradition at the heart of Western society in the hopes of restoring it. The success of writers such as Eckhart Tolle is due to a longing for wholeness felt by many intelligent individuals of all faiths, as well as those with no faith at all. There are professionals working in prevention in disadvantaged communities, as well as prison populations, to disseminate the understanding of psychology known as Health Realization, which is based on the insights of Sydney Banks. The findings of neuroscience are causing many to revisit reductionist assumptions regarding the mind/matter problem, as addressed in a recent New York Times article by David Brooks. The astronaut Edgar Mitchell’s efforts in establishing The Institute of Noetic Sciences is the result of a momentary glimpse of truth, and the recent media coverage of Jill Bolte Taylor’s transformation during and following her stroke, also profiled in a recent Times piece, are but a few examples.
I am certain that we are on the cusp of a paradigm change of significant proportions, though I do wonder if it will arrive without catastrophic consequences resulting from mankind’s appalling arrogance of the last 2500 years. And though it may appear to be a new understanding of reality, it will in fact be a return to an ancient understanding of reality, which Hall spent his entire life attempting to resurrect.
If and when it does, the masses, to paraphrase St. Paul, will be fed new milk. The common understanding disseminated will be that everyone and everything on earth, as well as the entire cosmos we inhabit, is but an aspect of the One divine source of existence, to which we are all deeply connected. This will not come about because someone decrees it to be so, but rather the elite of society will know this as absolute fact through conscious realization, and fully embody it. The priests, scientists and philosophers will all likely have moments of direct realization themselves, and the consequences of their direct understanding will ripple through all fields, leading to the reintegration of the three disciplines and discoveries that are entirely inconceivable from our current perspective. The masses will be taught to develop their intuitive sense, leading to a deepening respect for themselves and others, and the eventual disappearance of the awful problems faced by the underclass, as well as the disappearance, into the dark recesses of history, of the blood-soaked effects of over two millennia of horrific dualism.
That’s our hope for the future, and it may take centuries. It may also require tremendous pain before it arrives. Pain which, I’m afraid, is already upon us. A young widow in Albuquerque, and millions in the Middle East, could all speak to that fact much better than I.



Thanks
Thanks Michael, that's a great blog entry.
Kind regards,
Greg
-------------------------------------------
You monkeys only think you're running things
Thanks, Greg
I felt such a profound sense of loss while reading Hall's work. We have thrown a lot away over the centuries.
It's Time
Hello Michael,
The lack of morality is shocking these days, not just with the youth who are led astray by lowest common denominator television, gratuitous sex, gambling...to me its a full assault to further degenerate the human species, do those behind it conspire against us? Some for sure, but a lot of them lost their grip on reality long ago, their lives are filled by numbers..on their bank account, ratings. Most politicians have become talking dolls...no vision, no morals. Scientists sell their soul to the highest (grant) bidder. You consider the suicide bomber immoral, ok but far worse are the soldiers /pilots who push buttons to extinguish the life of anonymous humans, young and old, prefarbly from a position of maximum safety. It doesnt get more amoral then that. Those that pride themselves on these actions are held up as hero's and leaders, psychopaths and demons would be more appropriate. The insane desert religions should be forbidden..period. Their fearleeching demongod starved.
It's not as if we humans are totally ignorant but the wisdom is held back, marginalised or ridiculed by those that have been feeding with their demongod of the installed fear of the people. Keep them ignorant , their motto.
Here's a mind expanding vaccin..
Fred Alan Wolf is the author of Taking the Quantum Leap By examining the ideas of quantum physics and the ancient wisdom, Mr. Wolf suggests that we are now able to comprehend how the concepts of time and mind are reconcilable and can, in fact, have the same meaning. Captivating lecture by physicist Wolf held at the Theosophical Society.
The Spiritual Dimensions of Time Travel
A Man Can Not Begin To Learn That Which He Thinks He Already Knows (Epictetus)
Isn't it maddening . . .
A Man Can Not Begin To Learn That Which He Thinks He Already Knows (Epictetus)
. . . when we come across quotes like this from the ancient past?
Peter Kingsley once made the comment that Parmenides returned from the realm of the Gods with the gift of reason for mankind. The gift had a warning label attached: "Use this, but don't be fooled by it." And like careless children, we tore off the label and threw it away.
Thanks for the comments and the link!
By the way . . .
. . . to me its a full assault to further degenerate the human species, do those behind it conspire against us? Some for sure, but a lot of them lost their grip on reality long ago . . .
This is what no one understands, and that Hall was pointing to when he wrote The Secret Teachings. Kingsley also points to this in Reality and his other books and articles.
Nearly everyone has lost their grip on reality. What both Hall and Peter Kingsley are saying is that by abandoning the wisdom tradition of the ancients, mankind has convinced himself that the ultimate reality is the material world. It's not. It's a reflection of a deeper reality, which is spiritual in nature. Anyone who does not know (not believe, but know), that we are already in a spiritual reality that appears to be a material reality have lost their minds! Which is almost the entire planet.
The materialists scoff at any such suggestion, while the dualists posit a spiritual reality that's somewhere else, and further, that the 'spiritual' reality is the exclusive property of whatever particular faith they support, Which, of course, gives them the right to execute anyone who disagrees with them.
Nearly all thinking people recognize that things are a mess, but they don't understand that the source of the mess is that we have discarded the ancient knowledge regarding the proper use of our minds. There's no organized conspiracy that has created this - the Pope and Richard Dawkins are each making the assumption that their personal truth is absolute, and see each other as the problem. This repeats all over the world. Almost no one understands the difference between absolute knowledge and personal opinion anymore, because somewhere along the line we decided that a Parmenides or a Plato or a Hermes were 'mystics', when they were actually 'realists'. They understood the true nature of things.
Everyone thinks that all the problems would be solved "if only everyone thought like I do." What no one realizes is that the problems have arisen because no one is actually thinking! Their thoughts are thinking them, and they don't even know it. And that's the 'elite' of our society. Is it any wonder that we have absolute chaos in the underclsses?
Hmmm
"Those of immature mentality, on the other hand, when similarly confronted [by moral choices], are overwhelmed. While the former [the elite] may be qualified to solve the riddle of their own destiny, the latter must be led like a flock of sheep and taught in simple language. [emphasis mine] They depend almost entirely upon the ministrations of the shepherd. The Apostle Paul said that these little ones must be fed with milk, but that meat is the food of strong men. Thoughtlessness is almost synonymous with childishness, while thoughtfulness is symbolic of maturity.
Michael, I believe you are already aware of the high respect I have for your opinion, and although I do think Hall was totally right about trying to reconcile both science, religion and philosophy, I find myself uncomfortable by the above statement. This idea of dividing humanity into a mindless mob who must be gently—or maybe not so gently—led by the superior elite is, IMHO, the very thing that caused ALL the major ancient civilizations to collapse. After all, Even our cherished greek philosophers viewed slavery as a normal state of things.
Yes, sometimes I do feel most of humankind are like sleeping sheep that do not open their eyes to the subtler realities of the world, but most of the time those thoughts come out of my own pride and my need to feel somehow superior; in other words, out of my own vane stupidity.
The again, Mr, Hall wrote this back in 1928, when it was considered normal to think in term of social classes. But those same mindsets also generated terribly perverse outcomes, like the establishing of eugenics in Europe and America, and ultimely the Holocaust during WWII.
But then again, what do I know? I'm just part of the underclass, unqualified to form a good opinion on such matters ;-)
-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
This is where it gets tricky
I find myself uncomfortable by the above statement. This idea of dividing humanity into a mindless mob who must be gently—or maybe not so gently—led by the superior elite is, IMHO, the very thing that caused ALL the major ancient civilizations to collapse.
You are absolutely correct in recognizing this. This is what the Catholic Church accomplished in the Dark Ages, and what Islam hopes to accomplish today.
As I read Hall's manifesto, however, it became clear that the worldview that he was describing was not that of Greece or Rome or any other society that we have direct knowledge of, but of the societies that had preceded them. What Hall was describing were societies considered ancient to the ancients, when the masses were taught not what was based on a small cabal's personal opinion of the nature of reality, but on the direct realization of the underlying reality which they then fully embodied. Though there were aspects of the ancient understanding remaining, much had been lost by the time of Plato and Aristotle, and that loss has continued to where we now consider what those societies believed to be quaint mythology.
None of the societies that we consider ancient achieved anything close to full realization of the ideal. What is intriguing is that all of the societies that we consider as ancient, themselves had cultural memories of societies that they considered as ancient. Plato's story of Atlantis is an example, as is the legendary Hermes. The Biblical story of Adam and Eve may also be interpreted as a cultural memory of a lost period in which mankind fully embodied the divine, and then 'fell' from that height. These myths and legends are consistent across cultures. Both the Tao te Ching and The Inner Chapters of Chuang Tzu of Taoism make numerous mention of 'ancient masters', for example. Who were the 'ancient masters' referred to by those who were writing in 500 BCE?
The great philosophers of Greece and Rome had more knowledge of what had preceded them than we do today, and several of these men were able to directly realize for themselves the great, timeless truths that the lost cultures had known. The tide had already turned, though, and rather than being able to recreate the lost society, those who realized the truth were mercilessly persecuted.
The more I learn, Red, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that the entire story of history we're taught, both cosmic and human, is completely wrong. Rather than a linear process, I suspect that the truth involves a giant cycle, along the lines of the premise in the film The Great Year.
In any case, I want to make it clear that I'm in no way advocating that anyone rise up, declare "this is how it is", and force their vision upon anyone. I do think though, that the future of humanity, (if it has one), will look very similar to what I outlined in the closing paragraphs, and I think it's already begun to move in that direction.
Also, those of us engaging in these conversations are not those who are lost in the quagmire of the underclass. We are basically moral, thinking people (I think) that would never slaughter someone on a whim. The sheep do need new milk, and suggesting that both themselves and everyone they will ever know is just a little "God particle" that needs to act as such makes ethical choices easy. That's the 'single worldview' that I'm suggesting, but it will only come about if a critical mass of people realize it directly. They sure as hell aren't listening to me! :-)
As it is right now in the West, we have battling egos represented by the organized religions and the secular factions, and the consequences of that play out every day in the scenarios I outlined above. The disadvantaged are taught in the schools that we are nothing but a sophisticated animal that arose from primordial slime, while the religions offer dozens of conflicting messages founded on interpretations of truth, not truth itself. So the underclass decides for themselves, with tragic consequences.
In the Islamic world, a particularly sinister vision of reality is taught from an early age, and many arrive at adulthood never recognizing that they're trapped in a worldview. If they do question it in adulthood, they do so under fear of death.
It's an ungodly mess, and it all comes down to a failure to understand our own minds, and the hold our belief systems have on us. He may not of phrased it that way, but that's the primary message of Hall's book. Along with the suggestion that we might be wise to try to know ourselves.
Oracle
Along with the suggestion that we might be wise to try to know ourselves.
Just as the Oracle told Neo :P
-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
The Oracle
Most of those who flocked to see the Matrix never grasped that the entire movie is an allegory about Self-realization. (Neo = One).
I'm afraid most saw only a good sci-fi flick, with cool special effects and intense violence. I think I read somewhere that the idiots who shot up Columbine High School were playing out a 'Matrix' fantasy.
Talk about missing the point!
Hear Hear!
Carol A Noble
I agree with all you said, but that is the way we are. In the past people were lot more knowledgeable and wiser in dealing with their knowledge; today we pass the buck of responsibility to technology, not realising that this same technology is actually making us less human and less able, ie disabling able bodied people!
But the cycles of societies and histories continue, and we are in a decline and preparing for a new basic lifestyle before we start rising up again! But I'll be long dead by then, as will everyone here.
We need to learn, and to be humble - I wish I was more humble than I am - and learn to recognise what is happening around us. There are signals that we tend to ignore, at our peril. I am attempting to take note of the little insignificant signs that abound around us and am beginning to get a little chink of insight into how this information can used to all our benefits, but it is slow, and society generally (or at least the so-called rich elite) don't want us doing even that. Pity. We have much we can learn, and much we must do if we are not to fall irretrievably into the bog of iniquity.
Thanks Michael for your carefully described insight. It is warming to know there are people who can see much of what I have seen over the years. I need to know I am not alone in this, and you have just answered that nagging question. Thanks.
Thanks, Carol
I agree that the answers ultimately lay in humility, and that humility is an elusive quality! :-)
Your comments regarding the influence of technology brought to mind Charles Eisenstein's work, The Ascent of Humanity. The first section of his book (available on-line in its entirety), addresses this very issue, and how the rise of technology has been one of endless promise without genuine satisfaction for what ails us. Lifestyles have improved dramatically in the West, but contentment remains exceedingly rare.
I share your sentiment in that it helps to know that there are others who understand there is more to our lives than what we are taught to believe. Seeing deeply has its rewards, but it carries a price as well. (I'm sure that last statement won't be interpreted as appropriately humble by some!)
Thanks, again.
The universal law
Carol A Noble
I have formed this universal law which applies to everything, and can be understood if it is recognised that there is a limit to everything!
"For something to survive and thrive something else must die!"
As you say Michael, "seeing deeply has its rewards, but it carries a price as well." Everything has a price, any form of progress will mean sacrifice of some form, but I am beginning to wonder if progress is all it is cracked up to be. If we don't move in some way, change slowly, with understanding and possible vision ahead, then everything becomes static, and yet, the progress we have said we made as a society has not brought the satisfaction to our species that we thought it would. We have to recognise what we will give up, that there are limits, be prepared to lose something to gain something else. But people in this world want to keep all they treasure now, and add to it, instead of exchanging it for something else. That is the problem that needs to be resolved.
first one
This is a natural discovery, but you (Carol A Noble) are not the first one.
This concept is called zero sum . The concept is basically that the gains of the winner are equal to the losses of the loser.
There are many situations when this is not the case. There are situations when both sides win, and also when both sides lose.
International trade can be an example of both sides winning. Not always, but it does happen.
A good marriage is another example of both sides winning. Or any other kind of friendship - both sides win.
----
The large print giveth,
The small print taketh away.
Thanks
Carol A Noble
I hadn't heard of Zero Sum, however, I also relate the law to sacrifice, when a person chooses to sacrifice or is forced to sacrifice. It may give the same result as Zero Sum suggests, but it is more than that. We can do things, but we have to recognise that everything we do will automaticall have an opposite reaction due to the limits that exist around us.
But thanks for the info. It adds to my idea of the law. It doesn't matter whether I am first to think this or not. I came to this idea independently, which means I learned for myself from the situations and info around me that this concept really does exist, and this is in contradiction to the view regularly expressed by those in the elite positions of this world.
Yes, a good marriage can be an example of both side winning, however, to gain that success (win) I have also had to give up the ability to be single, to care only about myself and my life. I have to consider another person when I make choices/decisions and consider their reaction as it will have a great affect on what I do.
A good marriage is based on give and take, and both partners make sacrifices in some way or other to keep the marriage/relationship positive.
This law is more than just a simple win/win, lose/lose, win/lose situation. For when you gain something you will always lose something in return. What matters is whether what you gain is what you want to keep, or whether or not you regret the gain and now wish you had taken the other choice!