Yes
61% (347 votes)
No
26% (149 votes)
Still Not Sure
13% (72 votes)
Total votes: 568
- Reviews
- Interviews
- Reviews
Support TDG!
Got something from TDG? Give a little back:
Your support is appreciated!
User login
Navigation
Poll
Sub Rosa
Issue 6:
- Robert Bauval
- Collecting Crowley
- Secrets of Fatima
- Manly P. Hall
Caution: Arm Chair Civil Engineers at work
There has been so much pseudo engineering and science by so many people "who know the truth" it has become quite humorous to those who do know what they are talking about. LOL
All that's missing are quantum physic terms to add to the catch phrases...but "anomaly" does pop up enough times. ROTFL
Cheers
7
Also note that most people who respond to this think about the two big towers. And they say things like, there were no planes going into the big towers, or that those planes were remote controlled, or on autopilot or other such theories.
The poll is about a comparatively small building next door. Well, it is a biggish building for most purposes, but it was not one of the twin towers.
I think a lot of the responders to the poll missed that.
Still I don't think it is reasonable to analyze #7 as isolated from the whole complex. There was a lot of influence from the big towers. There was a lack of firefighting because of lack of firefighters - most of them died before they could get to #7. Also, the collapse of the big towers must have been equivalent to a small earthquake, really close to #7.
So, many more factors than just the fire.
----
The large print giveth,
The small print taketh away.
Agreed
Still I think its odd they melted the steel beams of the building before conducting a propper investigation. If not conspirational, it was down right irresponsible; although not that surprising considering all the blunders commited by the NY authorities (e.g. letting helpers work on the rubble without propper gas masks, resulting in a bunch of people now facing many respiratory illneses including cancer).
I went chicken on this one and voted "Not sure" though :-)
-----
It's not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me...
It's all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!
Red Pill Junkie
There is more to this than meets the eye
Carol A Noble
The day it happened I was shocked, but what shocked me most was the exact precise position of the camera which showed the second plane going into the tower. This was more like the planning for a movie, not live action. Some will say coincidence but there were other things that also bothered me, including the said use of cell phones on the plane which didn't make it to the pentagon. It is now known that defense departments have had the ability to use robot drones (planes) so who is to say that the black projects hadn't already found out how to do this with larger planes? As for the building 7 debacle. There are many programmes, documentaries, articles, on the way this particular building collapsed long after the others yet had not been attacked like the twin towers. It was all about money, the insurance, and government compensation, for the bloke who had bought most of the buildings in that area, including 7, only a few months before.
For those who are American, I apologise if this seems like a rant against your country - it isn't. It is a factual comment against those who would terrorise and do their best to dominate the human race. Some of them just happen to have been in the US, but they are all over the world so I am not against any particular country.
This vote was about building 7 and I find that particular loss more sleazy than the others, but I do believer that ALL of the buildings were targeted long before. The pity is that so many lives were lost in the process. Another holocaust.
cell phones
What is suspicious about the use of cell phones on airplanes?
----
The large print giveth,
The small print taketh away.
At the time
Carol A Noble
At the time of the event, cell phones were not allowed to be used in case of interference with the plane's computers. Since then there are safeguards in place which now allow cell phones, but they weren't then. The passengers would have known and would have been unwilling to use them!
unlikely
I think some of them would have been perfectly willing. Consider that they knew the plane had been hijacked, and that someone had already been killed.
Most airline passengers don't believe the security problem is real, or they don't care. There is always someone who has to be reminded in person.
Passengers also are not allowed to use laptop computers during takeoff and landing. But someone always does.
----
The large print giveth,
The small print taketh away.