Here's something I found this morning and it really makes me wonder. I'll make this short and simple. I came across this LA Times voter poll and voted for my favorite candidate and noticed that Ron Paul's results showed only 3.3% of the vote. I right clicked on that article and clicked view source. After scrolling through the code to the poll results I was shocked to see the results appear to be wrong. Could it be on purpose? Check it for yourself and see what I'm talking about: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/?vo...

Here's a copy of the poll results and the source code that apparently shows the results don't add up:

If the election were today, who would you vote for?
21.7%
Hillary Clinton
11.8%
John Edwards
1.8%
Rudy Giuliani
2.5%
Mike Huckabee
3.1%
Dennis Kucinich
4.3%
John McCain
22.4%
Barack Obama
28.0%
Ron Paul
3.3%
Mitt Romney
1.1%
Fred Thompson
19537 total responses

Source Code:

If the election were today, who would you vote for?

..
21.7%

Hillary Clinton
(4246 responses) -->

..
11.8%

John Edwards
(2306 responses) -->

..
1.8%

Rudy Giuliani
(342 responses) -->

..
2.5%

Mike Huckabee
(487 responses) -->

..
3.1%

Dennis Kucinich
(596 responses) -->

..
4.3%

John McCain
(834 responses) -->

..
22.4%

Barack Obama
(4386 responses) -->

..
28.0%

Ron Paul
(5479 responses) -->

..
3.3%

Mitt Romney
(654 responses) -->

..
1.1%

Fred Thompson
(207 responses) -->

19537 total responses