Why I Watch Cults

I have a fascination for cults. It has nothing to do with a cult itself, but what it can teach us about society. You see, I am convinced that by looking at the extremes of a subject, we can better identify what is normal.
Society seems such a complex subject. Foibles and fads come and go and there seems no rhyme or reason to the process. This is because it is mostly innocuous and quite mild. But look at a society in the extreme and patterns quickly emerge.
Take, for instance, the guru who begins a cult. He can come from various cultural forms, but a study of the guru usually reveals a standard life pattern. He will have been a loner who approached a crisis, and from this crisis he gains determination to follow a path. This turns him into a charismatic, and people become putty in his hands.
This process apes the ‘hero’ of mythology, and even the life pattern of Jesus Christ. It is entrenched in the human psyche. But if you dilute the process, what you actually have is a typical life pattern of the average person. It narrates the confusion of adolescence, the difficulty of choice in early adulthood and the actual career path to success.
It is the same with the disciple who joins a cult. Usually of above average intelligence, he is searching for something. The guru hooks him and shows him a cause, and the person falls in line with the new culture.
This is Mr Average within society. He will fix himself to many ‘cultures’ throughout his life, from following fashion to being an obedient worker. But only by looking at him in the extreme can we see order in the social processes involved.
In effect the cult highlights the leaders and the workers of society, and shows how they interact. When things go wrong, a cult can approach self-annihilation, and in its watered down form, this is the process of social change in society, throwing away an old system and adopting the new.
I watch cults because the abnormal is the extreme of the normal. A cult is a mirror on society itself.

© Anthony North, Mar 2007

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

intelligence

What you say makes sense, except the part of "usually of above average intelligence".

I submit: football fanatics, baseball fanatics, Labor party followers, union members, Conservative party followers. And so on, you know what I am saying.

Normal people get in a rut, for generations. They vote Labor, or american Republican, or German SPD, because their grandfather did. I would call that a cult.

I think the operative part is that people search for a while, and when they have found something, anything, they stick with that. After that, no amount of evidence will convince them.

----
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.

(Bill Clinton, and perhaps others)

Intelligence

Hi Earthling,
Yes, point taken. In 'cults' they do tend to be intelligent middleclass who get hooked, but as it is an extreme of the normal, then, yes, anyone can get into the watered down systems we have in what we call normal life.
Football and Republicans, though. That just doesn't seem to fit into 'intelligence' of any kind :-)

...

I'm fanatical about moderation

Anthony North

not sure about the intelegents part but...

...imagine the largest, dried salt lake ever. Nothing for thousands of miles. Then plonk 10,000 people in the middle of it. What you would witness soon after is every possible human emotion and random spreading and violence. Much chaos with a few controlled groups deciding on a survival stratagy.

My point is this: Society is not much different now. What is lacking is a true sence of direction. People know that their govenments lie to them, religion is false and not much makes real sence.
Intelegent people look for answers, not direction. One's who join cults are looking outward for self direction where as more intelegent people look inward.
Ask yourself this question:if you lost everything you have and found yourself totally alone.....how would you feel?

If you felt uneasy with that thought, then you are not free. To be truely free you would know that you can never be alone, you are always a part of the one.

If you understand that then you would know that extremism, cults and prejudice would not exist.

"Life can be whatever you want it to be, as long as you do what your told."
LRF.

Mr. North, good post

Mr. North, good post and an analytical way of looking at "Cults" and it offers a refreshing view. I really like the way you approached this subject and I agree there is a lot we can learn from "Cult" organization. Thus, I wish you would have cited some examples of "Cult" organizations and leaders and what you perceived we could learn that will assist us in our so-called "mainstream" approach to society.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight

Cult comment

Hi Floppy,
True, a well balanced person can never be alone. As for the 'intelligent' bit, this comes from a survey done in the 1990s by Dr Eileen Barker at the London School of Economics. I've simply bowed to her credentials. Although my own study of the subject seems to bear this out.
Consider the final stage of life of the Hindu, when they become a student of the spiritual. It is invariably done through a guru, not through self - even the intelligent ones.

Hi Fahim,
Thanks for that. If you're interested in the subject and my approach, I have an entire sub-domain on the subject here:

http://beyondtheblog.wordpress.com/2007/...

I can appreciate good thought provoking theories

Mr. North, definitely interesting and thought provoking site and information. I will take my time and go through all that good information, but it is outside the box information the kind humanity need to be exposed; I can appreciate good thought provoking theories. This is not a debate question, but would you consider the Nation of Islam a "Cult"? I knew the sociologist Dr. C. Eric Lincoln from Duke University and he classified the Black Muslim Movement a "Cult". What is your opinion? And thank you for giving us something to think about.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight

A cult

Hi Fahim,
The word 'cult' is hard to define, as it has many meanings, most fuelled by some politico-religious impulse or other. As for me, I would class a religious movement as having three basic phases:

1. It's conception, usually through a guru. This is what I'd call a cult.

2. It's growth to alternative religion status - this can include being an off-shoot of an existing world religion.

3. Mass popularity making it a world religion.

This is my definition, and it won't stand up to anyone's opinion who disagrees, but their definitions wouldn't stand up to mine either :-)
Looking at the present size of Nation of Islam, I'd say it is now into category 2.
I'm pleased you found the site of interest.

...

Reality, like time, is relative to the observer

Anthony North

another factor

Another factor that is present in most cults is the economic interest.

When a cult has a clearly identified leader, that leader can make good money from the loyal followers.

Or, that leader can derive significant political power from the loyal followers.

Now, the leader is sometimes an individual (a "guru" in todays language). Some other times, the leader is an organization. Like a church or the Toronto Maple Leafs.

Yes, the last sentence looks silly, if you take "cults" as just a religious concept. But I propose that the mechanisms are the same. What draws many people into the cult, and what keeps them inside, is the same kind of human bevaviour.

It is very hard to convince a serious follower that he/she was wrong in the original decision.

Apart from this, effective cults have to stay small. If there are too many members, there will be factions.

----
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.

(Bill Clinton, and perhaps others)

Cults and life

Good morning Earthling,
Yes, this is why I watch them so much - they hold within themselves the natural processes of life. In this sense, most elements of life can be seen as watered-down cultdom. Cults just show this process in its stark nature.
The point about cults being small is, I think, covered in my categorisations, above. Once it begins to grow it becomes too big for one man to lead, and yes factions begin.
Interestingly, it is often at this point that much of the fanaticism goes out of it, leaving an alternative religion, as 'managers' replace the 'revolution'.

...

I'm certain of only one thing. Nothing is certain

Anthony North

Thanks for the explanation

Thank you again for expanding our horizon.

Stay awake until we meet again,
Fahim A. Knight, Ph.D