Obama’s Birth Certificate Fraud – The Ten Little Indians

At this stage of the game with the evidence of document fraud now headed for congressional deliberation perhaps the most exemplary finding will be simply one of an important document fraudulently assembled and then placed on the whitehouse.gov web site and all the legal liabilities of such an act independent of the questions of Obama's legal right to have been POTUS.

Whether or not this next compels the state of Hawaii to release what is has - if it has anything at all in the way of a paper copy - remains to be seen and one can imagine legal delaying tactics that stretch into the future.

My interest in this has never really been to impeach a president. I was always more interested in the birth certificate scandal as it might relate to a president's "control file" or blackmailing file. Whether or not in the instance of Obama the "elephant in the living room" was a consideration in selecting him and grooming him early on the net effect of the dirty little secret was the same - it could be strategically used to steer him in certain directions most notably the "globalist" one by controlling how the mainstream media handled his various squirrely credentials. Like most presidents Obama appeared from the get go to be someone under "control" which explains his many flip-flops on policy as soon as he assumed office. It probably also explains Trumps flip-flops as well. No one rises high in office unless they can be blackmailed to a greater or lesser extent. At the end of this post there is a Corbett report video describing how the intelligence agencies - most especially the NSA now - hold the "keys to the kingdom."



Obama’s Birth Certificate Fraud – The Ten Little Indians



Karl Denninger, technology businessman and web expert:
“He explained that the type on the birth document showed evidence of “kerning,” the squeezing of letters into a line so that they don't intrude into adjacent letter spaces. Kerning is routine since the advent of word processors and computers, but impossible with a typewriter. “To refute this point you must come up with a typewriter that contains a flux capacitor and thus is capable of accurately predicting the future,” he said. “This document has been assembled by somebody on a computer.”
He contended “there’s only one way we’re going to get the truth – a forensic document examiner is going to have to go look at the certificate and authenticate it. The real one – not a printout.”

Paul Irey, typographer:
“To get his letters, the forger must have understood that he needed to copy the old typewriter styles,” he continued. “So the forger probably scanned a bunch of old birth certificates, without realizing that the letters in the old files were from different typewriter styles. That’s why the letters in the forged document do not match each other.”

Doug Vogt, expert on scanners and document-imaging software:
“Vogt said the curved surface on the left margin of the Obama birth certificate suggested the county employee who did the original scanning of the document did not take the individual page out of the binder.
“The result is that all the pages in that book display a parallax distorted image of the lines and type,” he said.
He claimed, however, that the information typed into the form does not curve like the printed text on the form itself.”
When the Obama birth certificate “forgery” comes to the public’s attention, Vogt predicted, “It will surpass all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.”

Ron Polland, researcher:
“To prove to my satisfaction that the long-form birth certificate was forged, I had to understand precisely how each anomaly was created,” Polland said, “and then I had to be able to use these techniques to produce a forgery of my own. I had to put myself in the forger’s shoes to figure out what he was trying to accomplish and why he made it look the way he did.”

Mara Zebest, computer expert:
“My guess is that the creator of this document was inexperienced when it comes to a multitude of concepts in using Adobe software,” Zebest said. “Whoever forged the Obama birth certificate might have known enough to be dangerous, but not enough to know how to cover up their tracks.”
Zebest concluded that whoever forged the Obama birth certificate probably did most of the digital manipulation required to construct the document using the program Adobe Photoshop.”

Ivan Zatkovich, telecommunications consultant:
“It is possible to take a single layer PDF and inadvertently create multiple layers, without changing the image in any fashion. But that does not appear to be the case here. The multiple layers in the PDF document are a result of changes made to the image,” his report said.”

Tom Harrison, software designer:
“I’ve read a lot about the purported Obama birth certificate, but I have not seen anywhere (until now) the simplest proof that it is a forgery: the overwhelming evidence provided by the presence of two ‘white dot’ groups in the image,” he explained to WND”

Israel Hanukoglu, researcher:
Utilizing the software program Foxit Reader version 4.3.1, the Israel Science and Technology website examined the PDF file posted by the White House and found that the last digit of the birth certificate’s number, 61 10841, disappeared under 800-percent magnification. Also, the font of the last digit was different from the other digits.
“This is only one example,” the Israelis concluded after examining the birth certificate number. “Many more examples can be discovered by examining magnified document with full page view of the document.”
Conclusion: “In brief, this simple analysis using just a viewing software reveals that the PDF document has been altered by a graphics software.”

Tim Adams, Hawaii elections clerk:
“Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health,” Adams’ affidavit reads, “and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government.”

Mike Zullo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio:
“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said in 2012. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”


See video

As we learn in this Corbett Report, much of what the FBI has collected via wiretaps, video surveillance and entrapment on a huge number of politicians (Obama was raked in as soon as he ran for senator, Trump has been surveilled for years,) political appointees, journalists, lawyers, court justices including supreme court justices, etc. was ultimately non-actionable because of FISA violations, and a further problem was that FBI underlings were growing restive and off-the-record talkative about what they were discovering; so the meat of the program data and ongoing project itself was handed over to the NSA which is not subject to such legal niceties and restraints as we learned from Snowden.
The NSA holds the keys to the kingdom, and has enough covertly gathered information, video, phone conversations, etc. to fatally embarrass much of the government currently in place. Hastert and pedogate are threads that if vigorously pulled would lead to a great unraveling which is entirely by design. There is enough intelligence to compromise politicians keeping them compliant when necessary while still keeping the overall blackmail project humming along because busting it open now would be a national and international catastrophe.


Clintons Knew Obama Ineligible & DNC Primary Fraud - Claims Hollywood Producer:



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
emlong's picture
Member since:
18 September 2007
Last activity:
1 day 4 hours

The obvious clumsiness of the faked Obama birth certificate was just a sweetening of the control file which may have been facilitated by either having the original birth certificate "lost" or removed in the past, or it may have been too damaged in one way or another to have been technically verifiable. Obama may not himself have known the actual status of the document other than what he was being told about it, and if he was being told that there was a problem then all the better - a leverage point had been created - a very powerful leverage point indeed.
High level document fakers could have easily created something much, much better. The very sketchy online document's release with its prompt questioning as to authenticity by the alternative media immediately placed Obama's legal status and reputation in much deeper jeopardy by an entity confident that it could control how the hoax was spun in the MSM - yea or nay. As long as Obama kept certain policy themes intact there would be no problem with the forgery. Now that he is gone there is further advantage in having the op busted in public or at least aired in public as explained below.

Revelation of the Method
"Michael A Hoffman II in Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, on what he calls the "revelation of method" by the "cryptocracy":
This is what simplistic researchers miss: the function of macabre arrogance thumbing its nose at us while we do nothing except spread the tale of their immunity and invincibility further. That is the game plan operant here.
To the belief system of the modern man it sounds too crazy. Why would the perpetrators want their secrets revealed after the fact? ... This question can only be definitely answered if one has an understanding of the zeitgeist which overseers in the cryptocracy have partly manufactured and partly tailored their own operations to coincide with. As I've pointed out, secrets like this were rarely revealed in the past because traditional people had not yet completed the alchemical processing (of mind control). To make such perverse, modern revelations to an unprocessed, healthy and vigorous population possessed of will, memory adherence to their deepest inner intuition and intense interest in their salvation, would not have been a good thing for the cryptocracy. It would have proven fatal to them.
But to reveal these after-the-fact secrets in our modern time, to a people who have no memory, no willpower and no interest in their own fate except in so far as it may serve as momentary titillation and entertainment actually strengthens the enslavement of such a people.
See what Hoffman is saying here? The Power Control Group (Richard E Sprague's evocative term from The Taking of America, 1-2-3) occasionally chooses to tip its hand to us as a mechanism of control. In nature it would be a threat display, except the threat implied here is the confirmation that things are really as bad as we think, and we can't do a damn thing about it.
I'm thinking, for instance, of the casual bombshell that dropped a year after 9/11, that on the morning of the attacks the National Reconnaissance Office was running a simulation of a plane crashing into a government building. A "bizarre coincidence," it was called. Though I believe the "simulation" likely a cover story, it's not exactly a limited hang out, since they hung it out there all by themselves in an announcement for a Homeland Security conference. ("On the morning of September 11th 2001, Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day.") Until then, no one was pressing the 9/11 wargames angle. Since, Mike Ruppert and others have discovered about a half-dozen more, suspiciously and opportunely timed to the attacks. Letting slip the "simulation" story is a bit like Jack the Ripper writing Scotland Yard and enclosing a portion of his victim's liver. Catch me if you can!
I'm thinking of the FBI promoting agents who deliberately inhibited pre-911 investigations, and its punishing those who saw it coming and tried to stop it. What message did this send, and could it be anything but the one intended?
I'm thinking of Michael Chertoff's appointment to Homeland Security, though he was accused of sabotaging the Department's "Greenquest" investigations into terror financing. I'm thinking of the appointment of Porter Goss to CIA directorship, though we know he'd met with 9/11 financier ISI Chief Mahmood Ahmed the morning of Sept 11, and his congressional seat encompassed the hijackers' Florida flight schools.
No administration has thumbed its nose more often, nor with as much feeling in our general direction, as this one. Its macabre arrogance contributes to a legend of invulnerability. That the White House can not only get away with it, but appear to revel in it, makes them seem untouchable."




"Hillary Trolls Michael Flynn On Twitter With PizzaGate Reference"