Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 18-02-2008

Humanity’s greatest challenge? Being all too wont to wander the primrose-strewn paths of the mind, perhaps?

  • Leading thinkers ponder the greatest challenges of the next 50 years.
  • Fragments of world’s oldest Christian manuscript found in Egyptian monastery.
  • Opportunity watches the clouds drift by — on Mars. Cool videos.
  • It’s Bubble O seven: James Bond’s underwater car becomes a reality.
  • Magnetic Reconnection: Thunderblogger Donald E Scott says astrophysicists have no excuse for trying to reinvent the wheel.
  • Gecko ‘begs’ insect for honeydew.
  • Earth’s oceans are vast, but not big enough to escape humans.
  • Phytomining and the Biomass Backlash.
  • Cannabis casualties, hybrid cars, and gamma rays in your brain.
  • If you’re wondering whether the media is actually this confused about science (to put it charitably), or trying to confuse us, read this (’cause such rare and pricey candor deserves a bigger audience).
  • Nonsense, dressed up as neuroscience, is being peddled to school children by their ‘credulous and apparently moronic teachers’. (Right up there with video game doping.) A better explanation of the research the first article talks about can be found here…
  • How extended explanations in refutations affect their acceptance, or, what negative political campaigning has to do with Pride and Prejudice.
  • Evolution in the classroom: Willful ignorance is the product of more than just ‘a change over time’.
  • Dumb and Dumber: Are Americans Hostile to Knowledge? The Age of American Unreason is available at Amazon US & UK.
  • What have we become?: Thoughts on Some Lessons From The Underground History of American Education.
  • New research shows that humans flock like sheep and birds, subconsciously following a minority of individuals.
  • When and why did languages become untranslatable? A proposed answer.
  • Study finds some thoughts really do require language.
  • Cognitive Dissonance: A recent example brings the original case study to mind.
  • How the ‘engineering mentality’ produces terrorists.
  • Wired‘s Lore Sjöberg recently discovered that ‘the mind is a cruel, lying, unreliable bastard that can’t be trusted with even an ounce of responsibility.’
  • Dopamine and Orgasm.
  • Australian scientists are developing a remote-controlled contraceptive implant for men. Guys and their gadgets…
  • Jonah Lehrer on the psychology and neuroscience of back pain.
  • How to get smarter, and (incidentally) save the world.
  • The Peace Drug: Post-traumatic stress disorder had destroyed Donna Kilgore’s life. Then experimental therapy with MDMA, a psychedelic drug better known as ecstasy, showed her a way out. Was it a fluke — or the future? Editor’s Note. Ironic, don’t you think, considering this next article…
  • One thousand lives a month: A renowned researcher estimates that 22,000 patients could have been saved if the Food and Drug Administration had removed the heart surgery drug Trasylol two years ago, when his study revealed widespread death associated with it. (Video segment from ’60 Minutes’.)
  • Spiritual healing: More hokum, or the ‘missing link’ in medicine?
  • Paranormal investigator called in after sewage workers are stalked by ‘zombie’ in underground tunnels.
  • Officials mystified by three bodyless right feet, each in a sneaker, that have washed up on the shores of British Columbia over the past six months.
  • Man says he’s found long-lost civil war gold, but the state won’t let him dig.
  • Newly-found documents related to JFK assassination expected to be grist for conspiracy theorists.
  • China: From basket case to superpower in 30 years.
  • How Attila the Hun, aka ‘The Scourge of God’, ground the whole of Europe to dust. If you’re into historical fiction, try William Napier’s Attila trilogy (books one, two & three) at Amazon UK.
  • We were stardust, we were golden: Memories of Australian rock festivals past.
  • The Wiki History of the Universe in 200 Words or Less. Why am I suddenly humming the melody to We Didn’t Start the Fire?
  • How imperfect symmetry shaped the universe we know.

Thanks, Rick.

Quote of the Day:

…We shall not try to make these people [the lower and middle classes] or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or men of science. We have not to raise up from among them authors, educators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for the embryo great artists, painters, musicians, nor lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we have ample supply. The task we set before ourselves is very simple… we will organize children… and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way.

Rockefeller’s General Education Board, Occasional Letter Number One, 1906, regarding public education in the US.

    1. I wonder…
      If this gizmo will appear in next year’s edition of The Sharper Image catalogue 🙂

      [quote]The device stops and starts the flow of sperm with the push of a button, using the same technology used to lock a car with a key fob.[/quote]

      And I imagine the control would be just as easy to lose, too 🙁

      —–
      It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
      It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

      Red Pill Junkie

  1. world’s oldest christian manuscripts
    [quote]In 1998, the ninth-century tower of Deir al-Surian was renovated, and several hundred fragments of ancient manuscripts were discovered by the monastery’s librarian Father Bigoul under a wooden floor which had probably collapsed as long ago as the 14th century.

    It is unfortunate that such drastic restoration of an ancient building was done so casually (surprisingly, it was authorised by Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities)[emphasis mine].[/quote]

    Heavens! Does that imply that our good friend Zahis is… biased, even careless, sometimes? Unbelievable!

    —–
    It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
    It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

    Red Pill Junkie

  2. Education
    Lots of links and a great quote about education today. Of course I’d be remiss if I didn’t make a small point about who has been educating America’s children for the last several decades. (hint: not conservatives, not Republicans)

    It takes a village. To turn children into mind-numbed tools of the State.

    ————————————–
    My apologies go out to all who were just offended by this hostile, confrontational and completely unreasonable post.

      1. And you know what they say…
        All good humor is based on truth.

        And the joke is on the kids.

        ————————————–
        My apologies go out to all who were just offended by this hostile, confrontational and completely unreasonable post.

        1. Just one unfortunate bit though
          I don’t believe in truth, all truths are relative.

          Actually, it is because of truths that there has been so many conflicts as an ideology seeks to prevail over ideologies.

          Were we universally conscious, truth would dissipate and all ideologies evaporate.

          Of course, it might make it harder to come up with a good joke.

          😉

          1. Really?
            [quote]I don’t believe in truth, all truths are relative.[/quote]

            Do you believe that statement is the “truth”?

            Or it just a punchline?

            ————————————–
            My apologies go out to all who were just offended by this hostile, confrontational and completely unreasonable post.

          2. Okey Dokey
            Then I don’t believe it. Or anything you posted. ‘Cause there’s no truth in it and its validity is all relative anyway.

            And that’s the truth!

            ————————————–
            My apologies go out to all who were just offended by this hostile, confrontational and completely unreasonable post.

          3. Exactly
            I agree totally with you.

            You must not believe, so there is no reason in the world you should believe me and all the reasons in the world you should not. Keeping in mind that not believing does not mean denying.

            The only reality is when human assumptions evaporate so that there is no truth left but only objective affirmation.

            Otherwise, the only thing left is argumentation, and humanity has been trading arguments for the sake of it and is not better off psychologically, even for all the great advances that its civilization has brought him materially.

          4. truth
            But then, what is the difference between ‘truth’ and ‘objective affirmation’ (aside from the emotional component I suspect).

            And how then do we go about confirming an objective affirmation? or is it always self-evident?

            —–
            It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
            It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

            Red Pill Junkie

          5. The difference
            Truth comes from this side of a veil made of lies to keep us away from our power.

            Absolute objectiveness comes from a world that dictates the laws of the inferior worlds and part of you dwells there.

            That part needs no truth to know and it has the power to dictate what it is and what it will be.

            Truth is the convention of ignorance until a better truth comes along, depending on the cultural context, which in turn is fabricated to maintain a specific direction for a civilization to take.

            Objectiveness is its own direction and it is verb.

            Objectiveness is the transfer of an energy from this faraway systemic dweller that is you but that never experienced matter.

            It is you once the wall that supports truths has been teared down, so long as you can sustain your own energy.

            That is why it was said that man could not see god without dying. If we saw what we really are, it would go so far against our conditioning that we may be psychologically destroyed instantly and unless our subtle bodies are strong enough to support the intake, they would be destroyed if it were to come down.

            But luckily, intelligence is extremely intelligent and time is no object. So, it wont happen until it is time for a person for it to happen.

          6. Yeah, but….
            [quote]Keeping in mind that not believing does not mean denying.[/quote]

            Sorry, but I can’t believe that. And neither can you.

            ————————————–
            My apologies go out to all who were just offended by this hostile, confrontational and completely unreasonable post.

      2. Sense of humour
        Richard said:

        ‘I am beginning to appreciate your sense of humor Anonymous.’

        I am beginning to appreciate your sense of humour, Richard 🙂

        The balanced adult retains an inner child

        Anthony North

        1. Damn
          Damn! The above comment went in the wrong place. Never mind.
          Anonymous, for once I’m almost in tune with your thoughts. But I’d answer by saying that moderation is the key to ironing out the contradictions.

          ..

          I’m fanatical about moderation

          Anthony North

          1. Maybe
            It can be, in some circumstances. But it can be dangerous too. For example, the key to stopping the Axis powers of WWII was not moderation. In fact, moderation allowed for the problem to grow into the calamity that it became.

            ————————————–
            My apologies go out to all who were just offended by this hostile, confrontational and completely unreasonable post.

          2. So then…
            Do you consider moderation —in some circumstanes— to be a weakness, or to be an element of delay into taking action?

            —–
            It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
            It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

            Red Pill Junkie

          3. Moderation and Axis powers
            Appeasement allowed the Axis powers to rise, not moderation. As to what beat them in the end, if you consider the strategies of the west, the high commands did not use all that was available. A certain selectiveness in strategy and tactics was present.
            This was, arguably, moderate. The alternative extreme response would have been Scorched Earth as we went along, interspersed with plenty of nerve gas. If this had happened, the war would have dragged on longer. Once Hitler was gone, surrender came quick because they realised we WERE moderate, and they wouldn’t have to fight for their lives.
            After all, they didn’t give an inch to the Russians, did they?

            I’m fanatical about moderation

            Anthony North

          4. Well, that and…
            [quote=Anthony]Appeasement allowed the Axis powers to rise, not moderation.[/quote]

            Well, that, and the fact that some of the Nazi discourse was not totally rejected by politicians and industry captains of Britain and the US. You know? the whole ‘master race/social darwinism/white superiority/antisemitism’ bullcrap had a certain appeal for some of those folks in high seats. It was only after they realized Hitler’s expansionistic ambitions would hinder their interests that they decided to put a stop to him.

            But if Hitler had resolved to stay inside Germany, I wonder if they would have dared to move a finger to save the german jewish.

            —–
            It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
            It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

            Red Pill Junkie

          5. Wow
            Wow, Red, that’s a good one. How can I answer it?
            Yes, there was a fascist element in the British establishment. Yes, there still is; as there is communist. But classing Britain as a European country, you can see a definite difference between Britain and the continent.
            Fascism had a strong base in most countries during the 1930s, including Britain. But unlike many European countries, it did not flourish. It remained on the margins.
            One reason, I think, is that the British are a false race. We don’t really exist. Take the English language. Follow any word to its roots and it disappears. The entire language is a magpie language, stolen from somewhere else. And so, too, our race. We are a bit of this and a bit of that.
            Confined on an island, we somehow learnt that compromise was better than fighting. This is where the legendary ‘fair play’ of the British comes from. And it is the unity that made us.
            Then, during the Enlightenment, philosophy on the continent went very holistic, using grand designs, but without the moderation vital to the thought pattern. Hence, the individual was buried beneath Statism as an almost secular religion.
            In Britain, we moved towards the individual and enquiry. This was continued by the US. Personally I think the outcome today is terrible – total materialism, atheism and individualism. But it is a reason why we didn’t succumb to either fascism or communism.
            As to whether we would have saved German Jewry? No, I doubt it. We would not have been directly threatened. Now, tell me one country who, alone, would have?

            I’m fanatical about moderation

            Anthony North

          6. Touchè
            [quote=anthonynorth] As to whether we would have saved German Jewry? No, I doubt it. We would not have been directly threatened. Now, tell me one country who, alone, would have?[/quote]

            Sadly, I can think of no one. Anti-semitism was universally latent and permeated several aspects of many societies, although nowadays no one wants to admit it.

            I suppose that’s part of the drive of the State of Israel: they realized long ago that in the end, all they have is each other.

            But we have to comfront the past, and admit that certain ‘scientific’ ideas like eugenics were discussed and embraced in many countries, including the USA. It seemed the logical approach to many very intelligent people, but that’s what happens when people see certain aspects of nature and use it to dictate morality. Take homosexuality: many people reject it because they say it is un-natural, and although this is clearly not the case, let’s assume it is; well, violence and brutality are also pretty common in the natural world, but I don’t hear no one telling that because a chimp kills and eats a much weaker member of its group, it’s morally valid to apply that to human societies.

            But that’s exactly what they said in the elite circles of the early XXth century.

            So those social scientists in Europe and Ameria would probably have sterilized someone like Stephen Hawkings…

            But what do I know? I’m just a lowly half-breed 🙂

            —–
            It’s not the depth of the rabbit hole that bugs me…
            It’s all the rabbit SH*T you stumble over on your way down!!!

            Red Pill Junkie

          7. Racism
            Good morning Red,
            Eugenics was something accepted by both left and right. Such luminaries as H G Wells were for it.
            I don’t think no one would have come to the aid of European Jewry in the above instance because of anti-Semitism, as such. More that it simply would not be done, for any reason. As for Britain, it took in a lot of Jews in the hundred years up to this period. One of the two greatest, most remembered British Prime Ministers of the 19th century – Benjamin Disraeli – was a Jew.
            But you raise some imortant issues. I’m actually running a series on Racism on my current affairs blog at the moment. You might find it interesting.

            http://an-eotw.blogspot.com/search/label/ONE%20BLOOD%20-%20A%20Study%20of%20Racism

            I’m fanatical about moderation

            Anthony North

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal