Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

News Briefs 03-08-2004

An archaeological trip around the world today – please return your seats to the upright position when finished and remember your personal belongings before disembarking.


Quote of the Day:

Of course, shamans also do other things besides making journeys to nonordinary reality. Some of these things may be thought to be rather strange to most people in our culture, such as talking with plants, animals, and all of nature. It sounds neurotic or deranged, of course, from the perspective of much of Western psychology. Nevertheless, our ancestors did it and managed to survive for 3 million years, whereas in the “civilized” countries of the world today, where people don’t talk with the planet and its inhabitants, we are faced with the possibility of nuclear destruction and ecological catastrophe. From these facts we may draw our own conclusions about which cultural assumptions are the saner.

Michael Harner

Editor
  1. Turning blood into chocolate
    My oh my, how alchemy has fallen! Seems chocolate is gold these days. If Jesus had have turned water into chocolate, then I’d probably be a Christian! Imagine, chocolate wafers for communion …

    Great link regarding Hindu revisionists — I’ve wondered the same thing, the sudden spate of Indian archaeology and alternative history making the news in recent years, if there’s possibly a biased force behind it. I met a man on the tram (funny little train, if you’ve never been to Melbourne) who was going to a Hindu festival the other week and he mentioned a lecturer who was giving a talk on the Hindu version of global history (Vedic texts, etc). I didn’t tag along as I had prior arrangements of utmost importance (ie, drinking beer with mates). Another conspiracy theory to add to the pile? I wonder at what degree it’s true, if Indian archaeologists are looking for Vedic evidence in the same manner many (but not all) archaeologists looked for Bible evidence; adhering to the scientific principles and objectivity and allowing the evidence to form the conclusion. To segue, there is a concerted Chinese Government effort to push for revisionist Chinese archaeology; ie, to rewrite history so Ancient China is the oldest, the biggest, the best, with the first this and the most unique that, etc. Which has frightening implications — just what Chinese archaeology is done objectively, and what is done to please the State?

    Cheers Greg,

    Rick

    “Read like a butterfly, write like a bee.” – Philip Pullman

  2. Robert Bauval talks about
    So Bob, what are you driving at? Who has not seen a connection between ancient monuments and text and the stars, sun and the moon? You want to make a point that is so obvious, it leaves me to wonder what the point your making is pointing towards. Sure, they did have a different attitude towards the tombs entrances between the different dynasties. Ever stop to consider they were different because people like to be different. Each generation needs to be different to show they are just that, different. Thats all it is. I can tell you that its (star cult worshiping) nothing more than a facination of something that cannot be touched. They worshipped the things that they could not understand. The things in the sky. The only thing in the daytime sky that they worshipped was the sun. Thats all that was there in the day for them to worship. And it was obvious to them that it brought them life. So it was the major factor in their worship. The stars where there at night, along with Luna. So, whats so suprising that there were star Cults in ancient times? Is this what you ponder and worry over? Well, now that you have figured this out, whats next?

    dd It is not true that life is one damn thing after another — it’s one damn thing over and over.

    1. DD
      DD,

      >So, whats so suprising that there were star Cults in ancient times? Is > this what you ponder and worry over? Well, now that you have figured
      > this out, whats next?

      I think you’ll find that Bauval is trying to answer critics (read ‘the orthodoxy’) who are saying that there is no stellar cult prior to this point and therefore some of his theories are therefore bunkum. He isn’t saying that he just noticed this, he’s trying to provide some scholarly reference points in response to those criticisms.

      Peace and Respect
      Greg
      ——————————————-
      You monkeys only think you’re running things

  3. US dollar bill, introduced in 1931 by Franklin D. Roosevelt
    What actually was the driving factor in the addition of the “all seeing eye” to the back of the all mighty US Dollar Bill in 1931?
    Had nothing to do with some bullshit masonry idealogy. It was brought about by a suggestion that the baseline monetary currency of the youngest country in the world needed to have an established look. Some representation of long standing durability.
    They wanted to convey a message to anyone that looked upon the (paper note), that it was an established foundation that could be relied upon in a time tested manner. The Pyramid was a given. When you look at it, you think of the Great Pyramid. The All Seeing Eye was added to convey the additional message that it was not a dead institution. That it still has a presence that witnesses the transactions that evolve around it.
    And thats just the way it happened. Like it, or not

    dd Fitzgerald: The rich are different from us. Hemingway: Yes, they have more money.

    1. Thar be sea serpents …
      Jameske,

      Isn’t there something southeast of England, a plateau that was once above sea level before the end of the last Ice Age? I remember Hancock mentions it in Underworld, I’ll double check tonight.

      The Adriatic Sea would be a good place considering it was solid landmass until the end of the Last Ice Age and was most probably occupied.

      Also, there’s a wee stretch of salty water between the Yucatan Peninsula and Cuba that might picque Ballard’s interest … 😉

      Rico

      “Read like a butterfly, write like a bee.” – Philip Pullman

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal