Click here to support the Daily Grail for as little as $US1 per month on Patreon

Tomb of Jesus Follow-up

Time has a follow-up on last year’s news about the alleged discovery of the ‘Tomb of Jesus’ (with movie director James Cameron backing the expedition). The story takes a look at a recent conference of Biblical scholars, organised by leading New Testament expert Prof. James Charlesworth, who gathered to discuss the finding/theory:

After three days of fierce debate, the experts remained deeply divided. Opinion among a panel of five experts ranged from “no way” to “very possible”. Charlesworth told TIME: “I have reservations, but I can’t dismiss the possibility that this tomb was related to the Jesus clan.” Weighing the evidence, says Charlesworth, “we can tell that this was the tomb of a Jewish family from the time of Jesus. And we know that the names on the ossuaries are expressed the correct way as ‘Jesus, son of Joseph.'” But the professor has a few doubts. “The name on Jesus’s ossuary was scrawled on, like graffiti. There was no ornamentation. And there should have been. After all, his followers believed he was the Son of God.”

There was at least one new revelation to come out of the conference: The widow of Joseph Gat, the chief archeologist of the 1980 excavation, told attendees “My husband believed that this was Jesus’s tomb, but because of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor, he was worried about a backlash of anti-Semitism and he didn’t think he could say this.”

Editor
  1. Most will view it positively?
    I thought the quote closing the article was interesting:

    [quote]Charlesworth, who is also a Methodist minister, says that the possible discovery of Christ’s tomb will illicit mixed reactions among Christians. Most, he believes, will view it positively. The faith of some believers, he says, will be buoyed by historical proof that Christ, the son of Joseph and Mary, did exist. “I don’t think it will undermine belief in the resurrection, only that Jesus rose as a spiritual body, not in the flesh.”[/quote]

    This coming from a Methodist minister is pretty shocking. My understanding of Christian theology is that the physical resurrection is at the core of the belief that Christ was the only son of God.

    I think Elaine Pagels spends quite some time on this issue in “The Gnostic Gospels”, pointing out that many of the Gnostic sects interpreted Christ’s message and the meaning of the resurrection quite differently from the orthodox view that eventually became today’s received Christianity. She interpreted the Gnostics as suggesting that Christ’s core message was to realize our own divinity as he had, not to worship him as a god. I recall thinking of the parallels with Buddhism when I first came across that idea.

    I hate to be so cynical, but it’s pretty clear as to why the Gnostics were persecuted into oblivion. It’s hard to imagine any way to control the flock if the core message is “You are all God – just realize it!” What happens when they do?

    1. I’m not surprised….
      [quote]This coming from a Methodist minister is pretty shocking.[/quote]

      Cafeteria Christians can be found in all denominations these days. Like the downfall of free societies, most damage comes from within.

    2. re: the true message of Jesus
      “She interpreted the Gnostics as suggesting that Christ’s core message was to realize our own divinity as he had, not to worship him as a god. I recall thinking of the parallels with Buddhism when I first came across that idea.”

      Yes, that is the true message of Jesus. He did not want to make “bodies” special nor did he want folks to make his body special.

      He was saying that we’re not bodies at all–but rather the sleeping “son” of God–seemingly divided but actually one when “the son” wakes from the dream of separation. The “between-life” state is also part of the illusion–the only *real* reality is that which is eternal (our true immortal nature which is not specific but abstract, unchanging, love)

      Thats what Thomas was trying to get across in his gospel and also in his current incarnation as author Gary Renard

      1. Re: True Message of Jesus
        [quote=gbv23]He was saying that we’re not bodies at all–but rather the sleeping “son” of God–seemingly divided but actually one when “the son” wakes from the dream of separation. The “between-life” state is also part of the illusion–the only *real* reality is that which is eternal (our true immortal nature which is not specific but abstract, unchanging, love)[/quote]

        This is the core teaching of all faiths, though few (especially in the West) realize it because of their individual convictions.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mobile menu - fractal